Professional Behaviours and Progression

Professional Behaviours
In the media industry, professional behaviours are near enough the same as in any other work industry. You have to be Confident and have Good Communicating Skills; this is because if you were a news reporter then you would have to be able to talk and communicate with others that you may not know to find out the information and facts to report on it. You also have to be good at Time Keeping, for example if you are a journalist, and you have arranged to interview a celebrity for a magazine article, and if you show up late, then the celebrity will get impatient, leave and you wouldn't have a story, and that celebrity may not agree to give any more interviews for that magazine.
Other skills are things like being able to work in as a team, being a quick learner, flexible  motivated, hard working, able to think on the spot and solve possible problems, as well as being friendly, reliable, responsible, organised and have good management skills.

Progression in the Media Industry

When you are wanting a job in the media industry, there is usually several ways to get to were you would like to be, and different stages of every way.

Here are two diagrams that I made showing the type different routes of the progression of getting a job in the media, with two possible routes.

The first one is the possible progression to becoming a film producer, starting for being a college student, and then either going along the route of further education, and going on to university and meeting and networking with people that way, and then going into full time employment and then working your way up to becoming a producer. The other route is leaving college and going onto trying to find work and get experience, in hope to get a job and the chance to work up to becoming a film producer.

And this second diagram in the possible progression route of becoming a News Paper Editor.

 

Issues surround Regulations

What is a monopoly?

A monopoly is the exclusive possession or control of the supply or takes in a commodity or service. What this means is that in media a monopoly is something a person or a company has when they own a large portion of the media market. Rupert Murdoch has a monopoly of businesses in the media sectors, because he owns lots of newspapers and television channels and more.


Why is it important to ensure that one single media producer in the UK has a monopoly?

It's important to make sure that no one person in this country has a monopoly because if they did, the media would be near enough controlled by just them. This means that everything we see, hear, and read would be controlled by that one person; therefore the information can become unreliable and of the opinion of that person, and things would stop being in the public's interest. It would be harmful to the public if one person had a monopoly in this country because they would not get fully correct information and would be influenced by the same person every day without noticing.

         Why is consumer choice important?

It's important for consumers to have choice over the things that they see, hear, and read, this is because they need to be able to decide what the best thing is for them. If they didn't have a choice, then they would hear the same thing over and over again, and it might not necessarily be right information. To have a varied choice is important so the news that they hear is not biased or wrong. Also, competition is important in the media industry because if there was no choice for a business, such as Sky for example, could charge a lot of money for their services and the public would not have a choice in paying it as there would be nowhere else they could go to get a lower price.

         What is censorship?

Censorship in the media industry is when some things are removed or suppressed for the benefit of the public. This usually happens when something is considered to be offensive or harmful to the general public.

 

         What are the arguments for and against censorship?

A good thing about censorship is that it can keep a certain amount of control in the media and therefore is usually seen as a good thing. It stops harmful, offensive, or obscene things being seen by the wrong people, like children, and this makes the media safer. However, some people argue that censorship is a bad thing because it can prevent people from seeing the truth and it can restrict freedom of speech.

 

         Why should under 18's be subject to particular considerations by regulators?

People under the age of 18 are often seen as being vulnerable people and should therefore be protected. They should not be shown things which could be potentially harmful to them in anyway. For example, when BBFC decide on which certificate a film should have, they must consider younger people and make sure that only people of the appropriate age group can see the film. If for example, a film has graphic scenes of violence or obscenity, the BBFC would choose to give the film an age certification of 18 to ensure that it could not harm, offend or upset them in anyway. But on the other hand, some under 18 year olds disagree about the certificates which some films are given. This is because they feel like they are mature and old enough to see those type of things, so have already experienced or witnessed themselves. So does this mean that there is no-need for the age’s rates to be so high?